Work Plan for the Feasibility Study for Remedial Action at J-Field, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland | Zendy

P. Benioff | Zendy; C. Biang | Zendy; R. Haffenden | Zendy; M.L. Goyette | Zendy; Louis Martino | Zendy; T. Patton | Zendy; C. Yuen | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Work Plan for the Feasibility Study for Remedial Action at J-Field, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

Author(s) -

P. Benioff,

C. Biang,

R. Haffenden,

M.L. Goyette,

Louis Martino,

T. Patton,

C. Yuen

Publication year - 1995

Publication title -

osti oai (u.s. department of energy office of scientific and technical information)

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Reports

DOI - 10.2172/91956

Subject(s) - remedial action , remedial education , plan (archaeology) , work (physics) , action (physics) , action plan , field (mathematics) , computer science , strengths and weaknesses , engineering , operations research , engineering management , management science , risk analysis (engineering) , business , mathematics , contamination , environmental remediation , management , geography , psychology , mechanical engineering , social psychology , economics , ecology , physics , mathematics education , archaeology , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics , biology

The purpose of the feasibility study is to gather sufficient information to develop and evaluate alternative remedial actions to address contamination at J-Field in compliance with the NCP, CERCLA, and SARA. This FS Work Plan summarizes existing environmental data for each AOC and outlines the tasks to be performed to evaluate and select remedial technologies. The tasks to be performed will include (1) developing remedial action objectives and identifying response actions to meet these objectives; (2) identifying and screening remedial action technologies on the basis of effectiveness, implementability, and cost; (3) assembling technologies into comprehensive alternatives for J-Field; (4) evaluating, in detail, each alternative against the nine EPA evaluation criteria and comparing the alternatives to identify their respective strengths and weaknesses; and (5) selecting the preferred alternative for each operable unit

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research