Optimizing Technology to Reduce Mercury and Acid Gas Emissions from Electric Power Plants
Author(s) -
Jeffrey C. Quick,
David E. Tabet,
Sharon Wakefield,
Roger L. Bon
Publication year - 2005
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.2172/909154
Subject(s) - mercury (programming language) , coal , chlorine , sulfur , waste management , fly ash , environmental science , chemistry , power station , environmental chemistry , engineering , electrical engineering , organic chemistry , computer science , programming language
Revised maps and associated data show potential mercury, sulfur, and chlorine emissions for U.S. coal by county of origin. Existing coal mining and coal washing practices result in a 25% reduction of mercury in U.S. coal before it is delivered to the power plant. Selection of low-mercury coal is a good mercury control option for plants having hot-side ESP, cold-side ESP, or hot-side ESP/FGD emission controls. Chlorine content is more important for plants having cold-side ESP/FGD or SDA/FF controls; optimum net mercury capture is indicated where chlorine is between 500 and 1000 ppm. Selection of low-sulfur coal should improve mercury capture where carbon in fly ash is used to reduce mercury emissions
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom