z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Investigation of Minimum Film boiling Phenomena on Fuel Rods Under Blowdown Cooling Conditions
Author(s) -
Stephen M. Bajorek,
Michael Gawron,
Timothy Etzel,
Lucas Peterson
Publication year - 2003
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.2172/812202
Subject(s) - boiler blowdown , materials science , boiling , heat transfer , rod , subcooling , critical heat flux , coolant , tube (container) , heat exchanger , annulus (botany) , header , mechanics , leidenfrost effect , heat flux , nucleate boiling , nuclear engineering , composite material , thermodynamics , mechanical engineering , inlet , engineering , statistics , mathematics , medicine , physics , alternative medicine , pathology
Blowdon cooling heat transfer is an important process that occurs early in a hypothetical large break loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) in a pressurized water reactor. During blowdown, the flow through the hot assembly is a post-critical heat flux dispersed droplet flow. The heat transfer mechanisms that occur in blowdown cooling are complex and depend on droplet and heated surface interaction. In a safety analysis, it is of considerable importance to determine the thermal-hydraulic conditions leading to the minimum film boiling temperature, Tmin. A flow boiling rig for measurement of blowdown cooling heat transfer and quench phenomena on a nuclear fuel rod simulator was designed and constructed for operation at up to 12.4 MPa. The test section consisted of a concentric annulus, with a 9.5 mm OD nuclear fuel rod simulator at the center. The rod was contained within a 0.85 mm thick, 19 mm OD 316 stainless steel tube, forming the flow channel. Two types of rods were tested; one type was sheathed with Inconel 600 while the other was clad with Zircaloy-2. Water was injected into the test section at the top of the heated length through an injection header. This header was an annular sign that fit around the fuel rod simulator and within the stainless steel tube. Small spacers aligned the injection header and prevented contract with either the heater rod or the tube. A series of small diameter holes at the bottom of the header caused the formation of droplets that became entrained with the steam flow. The test section design was such that quench would take place on the rod, and not along the channel outer annulus

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here