z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison studies of head-end reprocessing using three LWR fuels
Author(s) -
J.H. Goode,
R.G. Stacy,
V.C.A. Vaughen
Publication year - 1980
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.2172/710833
Subject(s) - plutonium , nuclear fission product , radiochemistry , fission products , uranium dioxide , dissolution , uranium , materials science , zirconium alloy , chemistry , fission , nuclear chemistry , actinide , zirconium , metallurgy , nuclear physics , neutron , physics
The removal of {sup 3}H by voloxidation and the dissolution behavior of two PWR and one BWR fuels were compared in hot-cell studies. The experiments showed that >99% of the {sup 3}H contained in the irradiated UO{sub 2} was volatilized by oxidation in air at 753{sup 0}K (480{sup 0}C). The oxidation did not affect the dissolution of the uranium and plutonium in 7 M HNO{sub 3} (0.02 to 0.03% insoluble plutonium) but did create a fission-product residue that was two to three times more insoluble. From 40 to 69% of the ternary fission-product {sup 3}H was found in the Zircaloy cladding of the fuel rods. Voloxidation had little effect on the {sup 3}H held in the Zircaloy cladding; oxidation for 6 h at 753{sup 0}K released only 0.05% of the {sup 3}H

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom