z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cermet composite thermal spray coatings for erosion and corrosion protection in combustion environment. Semi-annual report, August 14, 1996--January 14, 1997
Author(s) -
B.F. Levin,
J. N. DuPont,
A. R. Marder
Publication year - 1997
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.2172/492379
Subject(s) - cermet , materials science , thermal spraying , corrosion , metallurgy , composite number , powder metallurgy , ceramic , volume fraction , erosion , metal , combustion , composite material , microstructure , coating , paleontology , biology , chemistry , organic chemistry
Research is being conducted to determine the optimum ceramic/metal combination in thermally sprayed metal matrix composite coatings for erosion and corrosion resistance in new coal-fired boilers. The cermet composites will be produced using powder metallurgy and electrodeposition. Model Ni-Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} cermet coatings with varying alumina fractions were produced. During this period, powder processed and electrodeposited composites were tested in the erosion simulator (Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} erodent, 40 m/s velocity, 90{degree} impact angle) and their relative erosion resistances were determined. It was found that electrodeposited Ni-Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} composites containing small Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} particles (1{mu}m)s showed better erosion resistance than powder processed composites with large Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} particles (12{mu}m). Also, an increase in volume fraction of Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} particles in powder processed alloys led to decreased erosion resistance. For both powder processed and electrodeposited Ni-Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} composites, addition of hard Al{sub 2}O{sub 3} particles did not improve erosion resistance compared with pure Ni

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here