z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
On conditions and parameters important to model sensitivity for unsaturated flow through layered, fractured tuff; Results of analyses for HYDROCOIN [Hydrologic Code Intercomparison Project] Level 3 Case 2: Yucca Mountain Project
Author(s) -
R. W. Prindle,
P.L. Hopkins
Publication year - 1990
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.2172/137939
Subject(s) - hydrogeology , flow (mathematics) , groundwater flow , sensitivity (control systems) , water table , geology , nonlinear system , boundary value problem , mechanics , vadose zone , groundwater , hydraulic conductivity , geotechnical engineering , environmental science , mathematics , aquifer , soil science , engineering , physics , electronic engineering , mathematical analysis , quantum mechanics , soil water
The Hydrologic Code Intercomparison Project (HYDROCOIN) was formed to evaluate hydrogeologic models and computer codes and their use in performance assessment for high-level radioactive-waste repositories. This report describes the results of a study for HYDROCOIN of model sensitivity for isothermal, unsaturated flow through layered, fractured tuffs. We investigated both the types of flow behavior that dominate the performance measures and the conditions and model parameters that control flow behavior. We also examined the effect of different conceptual models and modeling approaches on our understanding of system behavior. The analyses included single- and multiple-parameter variations about base cases in one-dimensional steady and transient flow and in two-dimensional steady flow. The flow behavior is complex even for the highly simplified and constrained system modeled here. The response of the performance measures is both nonlinear and nonmonotonic. System behavior is dominated by abrupt transitions from matrix to fracture flow and by lateral diversion of flow. The observed behaviors are strongly influenced by the imposed boundary conditions and model constraints. Applied flux plays a critical role in determining the flow type but interacts strongly with the composite-conductivity curves of individual hydrologic units and with the stratigraphy. One-dimensional modeling yields conservative estimates of distributions of groundwater travel time only under very limited conditions. This study demonstrates that it is wrong to equate the shortest possible water-travel path with the fastest path from the repository to the water table. 20 refs., 234 figs., 10 tabs

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here