A comparison of adjoint and data-centric verification techniques. | Zendy

Timothy Wildey | Zendy; Eric C. Cyr | Zendy; John N. Shadid | Zendy; Roger P. Pawlowski | Zendy; Thomas M. Smith | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A comparison of adjoint and data-centric verification techniques.

Author(s) -

Timothy Wildey,

Eric C. Cyr,

John N. Shadid,

Roger P. Pawlowski,

Thomas M. Smith

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

osti oai (u.s. department of energy office of scientific and technical information)

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Reports

DOI - 10.2172/1095937

Subject(s) - milestone , a priori and a posteriori , computer science , computational fluid dynamics , data assimilation , state (computer science) , algorithm , data mining , aerospace engineering , meteorology , engineering , philosophy , physics , archaeology , epistemology , history

This document summarizes the results from a level 3 milestone study within the CASL VUQ effort. We compare the adjoint-based a posteriori error estimation approach with a recent variant of a data-centric verification technique. We provide a brief overview of each technique and then we discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages. We use Drekar::CFD to produce numerical results for steady-state Navier Stokes and SARANS approximations. 3

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research