z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED REACTORS
Author(s) -
E. A. Ibrahim
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
osti oai (u.s. department of energy office of scientific and technical information)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.2172/1059428
Subject(s) - computational fluid dynamics , mechanics , turbulence , fluent , flow (mathematics) , fluidized bed combustion , transient (computer programming) , inlet , computation , control volume , two phase flow , work (physics) , materials science , steady state (chemistry) , volume (thermodynamics) , phase (matter) , scaling , fluidized bed , mechanical engineering , engineering , physics , thermodynamics , computer science , chemistry , mathematics , geometry , algorithm , quantum mechanics , operating system
Details of numerical simulations of two-phase gas-solid turbulent flow in the riser section of Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor (CFBR) using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) technique are reported. Two CFBR riser configurations are considered and modeled. Each of these two riser models consist of inlet, exit, connecting elbows and a main pipe. Both riser configurations are cylindrical and have the same diameter but differ in their inlet lengths and main pipe height to enable investigation of riser geometrical scaling effects. In addition, two types of solid particles are exploited in the solid phase of the two-phase gas-solid riser flow simulations to study the influence of solid loading ratio on flow patterns. The gaseous phase in the two-phase flow is represented by standard atmospheric air. The CFD-based FLUENT software is employed to obtain steady state and transient solutions for flow modulations in the riser. The physical dimensions, types and numbers of computation meshes, and solution methodology utilized in the present work are stated. Flow parameters, such as static and dynamic pressure, species velocity, and volume fractions are monitored and analyzed. The differences in the computational results between the two models, under steady and transient conditions, are compared, contrasted, and discussed

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom