English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In recognition of the impact of logistics sprawl on economic development, there arises a need to find the optimum direction in freight transport development. This paper employs the co-benefit framework to assess three freight development programs: a) Freight consolidation centers; b) Freight volume shift to outer ports and c) Rail freight. Using the benefits of travel time reduction, operating cost reduction and savings in accident losses and CO2, SOx, NOx, and PM emissions as assessment metrics, the policy assessment procedure undertaken was able to cover the interests of both the stakeholders and the community. It was found that for the Greater Capital Region of the Philippines, shifting freight traffic to the outer ports while consolidating truck trips at designated locations was most effective, resulting to a combined annual benefit of as much as PhP 362.72 billion by the year 2050. Modeling results showed that shifting freight traffic to the outer ports dramatically reduces travel time, while consolidation of truck trips optimizes freight operations, and thus, reduces emissions. It was also found that this combination has a profound relationship, emphasized by the traffic safety benefit.

CO-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT OF LOGISTICS OPTIMIZATION PROGRAMS: THE CASE OF THE PHILIPPINE GREATER CAPITAL REGION