z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Application of hybrid electrocoagulation–filtration methods in the pretreatment of marine aquaculture wastewater
Author(s) -
Jianping Xu,
Yishuai Du,
Tianlong Qiu,
Li Zhou,
Ye Li,
Fudi Chen,
Jianming Sun
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
water science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.406
H-Index - 137
eISSN - 1996-9732
pISSN - 0273-1223
DOI - 10.2166/wst.2021.044
Subject(s) - electrocoagulation , filtration (mathematics) , chemical oxygen demand , anode , wastewater , pulp and paper industry , hydraulic retention time , chemistry , filter (signal processing) , nitrate , nitrogen , sewage treatment , nitrite , environmental engineering , environmental science , electrode , statistics , mathematics , organic chemistry , computer science , engineering , computer vision
The aim of this study was to provide technical means and data support for enhancing the filtration pretreatment capacity of a recirculating aquaculture system. A continuous flow electrocoagulation (EC)-filtration system was designed and its application in the pretreatment of marine aquaculture wastewater was studied. The influences of anode combination modes, hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of the EC reactor and filter pore sizes on the water treatment capacity were investigated. Results showed that EC could significantly enhance the treatment efficiency of the filtration equipment used in subsequent steps. Al-Fe electrodes used as anode led to better processing capacity of this system, and the optimum anode was 3Al + Fe. With the increase of HRT and decrease of filter pore size, the enhanced effect of the EC process on the filter was more obvious. When the current density was 19.22 A/m 2 , the anode was 3Al + Fe, the HRT was 4.5 min and the filter pore size was 45 μm, the removal efficiency of the system for Vibrio, chemical oxygen demand, total ammonia nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen (NO 2 - -N), nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 - -N) and total nitrogen was 69.55 ± 0.93%, 48.99 ± 1.42%, 57.06 ± 1.28%, 34.09 ± 2.27%, 18.47 ± 1.88% and 55.26 ± 1.42%, respectively, and the energy consumption was (26.25 ± 4.95) × 10 -3 kWh/m 3 .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom