Effect of source water/wastewater quality on bacterial removal during electrocoagulation | Zendy

Gudla Sruthi | Zendy; M. Mansoor Ahammed | Zendy; Abhipsa R. Makwana | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Effect of source water/wastewater quality on bacterial removal during electrocoagulation

Author(s) -

Gudla Sruthi,

M. Mansoor Ahammed,

Abhipsa R. Makwana

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

water science and technology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.406

H-Index - 137

eISSN - 1996-9732

pISSN - 0273-1223

DOI - 10.2166/wst.2018.024

Subject(s) - wastewater , electrocoagulation , environmental science , water quality , waste management , environmental engineering , water source , sewage treatment , pulp and paper industry , chemistry , engineering , water resource management , biology , ecology

Bacterial removal during electrocoagulation (EC) was investigated employing samples from four different water/wastewater sources, namely, greywater, river water, secondary treated sewage and tap water spiked with Escherichia coli. Effects of current density and electrolysis time on the bacterial removal with aluminium electrodes were evaluated. For greywater, river water and secondary treated sewage, total coliform and E. coli removal efficiencies were not significantly different for the tested samples and varied in the range of 2.22-2.53 log 10 units at a current density of 1 mA/cm 2 and electrolysis time of 30 min. Higher removals up to 3.80 log 10 units could be obtained at higher current density of 5 mA/cm 2 . Heterotrophic bacterial removals were higher compared with coliforms for the tested samples. Further, higher removal was obtained with spiked E. coli in tap water compared with naturally occurring coliforms in other samples. A comparison of bacterial removal by chemical coagulation (CC) employing alum at optimum dose with that by EC with 1 mA/cm 2 current density and 30 min electrolysis time showed significantly higher removal by EC (2.22-2.53 log 10 removal) compared with CC (1.40-1.80 log 10 removal) for the three tested samples. Upon storage up to 48 h, no significant regrowth/decay of organisms was observed in the EC-treated samples.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research