z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Estimating output flow depth from Rockfill Porous media
Author(s) -
Hadi Norouzi,
Mohammad Hosein Hasani,
Jalal Bazargan,
Seyed Mohammad Shoaei
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
water science and technology water supply
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.318
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1607-0798
pISSN - 1606-9749
DOI - 10.2166/ws.2021.317
Subject(s) - porous medium , flow (mathematics) , mechanics , geotechnical engineering , porosity , materials science , geology , physics
To analyze the flow in a rockfill porous media using the Gradually Varied Flows theory (one-dimensional flow analysis) and solving the Parkin equation (two-dimensional flow analysis), calculation of the output flow depth as the downstream boundary condition is of great importance. In most previous studies, the output flow depth has been considered equal to the critical depth. In the rockfill porous media, unlike free surface channels, the fluid weight is exerted to the aggregates in addition to the flow, and therefore, the output flow depth from the rockfill is always greater than the critical depth (flow leaves the rockfill with a specific energy greater than the critical energy), and is expressed as a coefficient (Γ) of the critical depth. In the present study, using dimensional analysis and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and experimental data in different conditions (a total of 178 experimental data for rounded, crashed, Glass artificial materials with rhomboid structure, Glass artificial materials with cubic structure, sandy natural materials), an equation was presented to calculate the mentioned coefficient as a function of the physical characteristics of the rockfill porous media as well as the flow that can be used for all experimental conditions with high accuracy. If the output flow depth is considered to be equal to the critical depth, the mean relative error (MRE) in terms of using the experimental data of the mentioned materials separately and for the data of all the mentioned materials together was equal to 84.40, 83.81, 60.62, 67.68, 74.82 and 69.96%, respectively. In the case of using the proposed equation in the present study, the corresponding values of 5.49, 4.72, 6.24, 4.41, 6.42 and 8.99% were calculated, respectively.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom