z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Theory and preliminary experimental verification of the directional difference of overland flow resistance in distributed hydrological models
Author(s) -
Shengtang Zhang,
Yuanchen Liu,
Jingzhou Zhang,
Ying Liu,
Zhikai Wang
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
water science and technology water supply
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.318
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1607-0798
pISSN - 1606-9749
DOI - 10.2166/ws.2018.040
Subject(s) - surface runoff , flow (mathematics) , vegetation (pathology) , hydrology (agriculture) , hydraulic roughness , geology , surface finish , flow resistance , soil science , flow conditions , geotechnical engineering , geometry , environmental science , mathematics , materials science , ecology , medicine , biology , pathology , composite material
Overland flow is influenced by the spatial variability of the watershed surface and the distribution of vegetation in the process of confluence. Thus, Manning9s roughness coefficient, in different directions on the slope, has different values. This causes different effects on the resistance to flow in the downstream direction of each grid cell, affecting the flow distribution among the grid cells of a distributed hydrological model. To show that the spatial variation of the overland vegetation had the effect of directional difference resistance to the overland flow, this study used an indoor fixed-bed test. We used a cylinder to simulate the stems of the vegetation used in the study. We modeled the relationship between Manning9s roughness coefficient and flow depth and studied this relationship for three types of vegetation distributed at three different slopes of 0.0%, 0.5%, and 1.0%. The slopes were based on three angles of 30°, 45°, and 90° between the vegetation rows and flow. The results showed that the resistance of overland flow had directional differences caused by the spatial variability of the vegetation distribution. At the same slope and flow depth, Manning9s roughness coefficient decreased as the angle between flow and vegetation rows increased. At the same slope, the angle between flow and vegetation rows and Manning9s roughness coefficient increased as flow depth increased. The slope did not affect the law of Manning9s roughness coefficient with changes in the angle between flow and vegetation rows.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom