z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
US Flood risk management in changing times
Author(s) -
Gregory B. Baecher,
Gerald E. Galloway
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
water policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.488
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1996-9759
pISSN - 1366-7017
DOI - 10.2166/wp.2021.269
Subject(s) - flood risk management , flood myth , hazard , satisficing , risk management , risk analysis (engineering) , environmental planning , face (sociological concept) , environmental resource management , business , economics , geography , finance , sociology , social science , chemistry , archaeology , organic chemistry , microeconomics
The traditional regulatory and policy approach to flood risk in the US has been the optimization of benefits and costs, broadly mandated by federal policy. However, optimization may not be the best approach to flood risk management in light of the deep uncertainties we now face. A more incremental approach using a satisficing strategy may be. Flood risk is a function of the hydrologic factors that produce a hazard and the consequences of the hazard interfacing with the people and property exposed. Regretfully, both hydrologists and climatologists seem unable to provide the clairvoyant guidance needed by the water community facing major decisions on flood risk management in the coming years. As the seminal ‘Red Book’ noted, two things have become second nature to policy analysts and risk managers: absolute safety is unachievable, and it is necessary to distinguish between science and policy. The forcing elements and largest unknowns in determining risk rest with understanding the hydrologic factors involved in shaping the hazard.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom