z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Nepal–India water cooperation: consequences of mutuality or hegemony?
Author(s) -
Dharma Raj Bagale
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
water policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.488
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1996-9759
pISSN - 1366-7017
DOI - 10.2166/wp.2020.135
Subject(s) - ratification , treaty , hegemony , deadlock , constructive , political science , development economics , international trade , business , economic growth , law , economics , politics , distributed computing , process (computing) , computer science , operating system
This article reviews the relationship between Nepal and India, particularly in water resources cooperation. The two South Asian neighbours have entered into a number of agreements/treaties in water resources, namely, Sarada Agreement (1920), Kosi Agreement (1954), Gandak Agreement (1959) and Mahakali Treaty (1996). Nepal is criticized within the country for being unable to secure its benefits, and that all the agreements are in India's favour. However, the Indian side claims that overpoliticization of water issues in Nepal is the reason for not achieving the benefits from these agreements. Since the Mahakali Treaty, there has been deadlock in Nepal–India water cooperation as the implementation of the treaty has not materialized even after more than two decades since its ratification. Therefore, all the forms of cooperation in the past between Nepal and India can be viewed as the consequence of hydro-hegemony rather than mutuality. The article concludes that both nations need to move forward to create mutual trust for the equitable utilization of water resources, as there is huge potential for constructive cooperation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom