Why isn't IWRM working in the Caribbean?
Author(s) -
Adrian Cashman
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
water policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.488
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1996-9759
pISSN - 1366-7017
DOI - 10.2166/wp.2017.100
Subject(s) - integrated water resources management , typology , political science , stakeholder , environmental planning , environmental resource management , water resources , geography , environmental science , public relations , ecology , archaeology , biology
At the global level, it appears that acceptance for integrated water resources management (IWRM) has been growing. In a status report by the United Nations in 2012, 82% of the 134 nations which responded indicated that they had embarked on reforms to achieve integrated approaches to water resources management. Over the last decade in the Caribbean there have been similar IWRM agendas. However, so far efforts to embed IWRM in the region have yielded few results. Hence it is appropriate to ask what has been the progress with adopting an integrated approach to water management in the Caribbean and are there lessons that can be learnt? The paper seeks to provide some answers to those two questions. An overview of the various national and regional IWRM initiatives over the last decade provides the basis on which the evaluation of the successes or otherwise is made. This is complemented by an assessment of the enabling conditions and the extent to which they have been able to support developments. The analysis of contributing factors uses a stakeholder characterisation typology developed by Mitchell and Agle. Finally, the need for ‘brokering’ actors as an integral part of policy reform is identified as a necessary element of success.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom