z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Baglihar difference and its resolution process - a triumph for the Indus Waters Treaty?
Author(s) -
Salman M.A. Salman
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
water policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.488
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1996-9759
pISSN - 1366-7017
DOI - 10.2166/wp.2008.060b
Subject(s) - indus , treaty , hydropower , significant difference , law , political science , business , engineering , statistics , mathematics , biology , paleontology , electrical engineering , structural basin
On January 15, 2005, Pakistan approached the World Bank asking the Bank to appoint a Neutral Expert to address a “difference” which had arisen with India under the Indus Waters Treaty. The difference related to the Baglihar hydropower plant which was under construction by India. The Bank appointed a Neutral Expert four months later, following lengthy exchanges with the two parties. On February 12, 2007, about 20 months after his appointment, the Neutral Expert issued his decision on the difference. This article reviews the main provisions of the Treaty, examines the process for the appointment and for the decision of the Neutral Expert, and analyzes the decision.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom