z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Selecting rep-PCR markers to source track fecal contamination in Laguna Lake, Philippines
Author(s) -
Kevin L. Labrador,
Mae Ashley G. Nacario,
Gicelle T. Malajacan,
Joseth Jermaine M. Abello,
Luiza H Galarion,
Christopher Rensing,
Windell L. Rivera
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of water and health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.482
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1996-7829
pISSN - 1477-8920
DOI - 10.2166/wh.2019.042
Subject(s) - linear discriminant analysis , biology , dna profiling , feces , fecal coliform , genotyping , fingerprint (computing) , polymerase chain reaction , veterinary medicine , source tracking , principal component analysis , escherichia coli , typing , sewage , statistics , mathematics , environmental science , microbiology and biotechnology , ecology , genetics , artificial intelligence , genotype , computer science , environmental engineering , dna , medicine , world wide web , gene , water quality
Fecal contamination is one of the factors causing deterioration of Laguna Lake. Although total coliform levels are constantly monitored, no protocol is in place to identify their origin. This can be addressed using the library-dependent microbial source tracking (MST) method, repetitive element sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) fingerprinting. Serving as a prerequisite in developing the host-origin library, we assessed the discriminatory power of three fingerprinting primers, namely BOX-A1R, (GTG) 5 , and REP1R-1/2-1. Fingerprint profiles were obtained from 290 thermotolerant Escherichia coli isolated from sewage waters and fecal samples of cows, chickens, and pigs from regions surrounding the lake. Band patterns were converted into binary profiles and were classified using the discriminant analysis of principal components. Results show that: (1) REP1R-1/2-1 has a low genotyping success rate and information content; (2) increasing the library size led to more precise estimates of library accuracy; and (3) combining fingerprint profiles from BOX-A1R and (GTG) 5 revealed the best discrimination (average rate of correct classification (ARCC) = 0.82 ± 0.06) in a two-way categorical split; while (4) no significant difference was found between the combined profiles (0.74 ± 0.15) and using solely BOX-A1R (0.76 ± 0.09) in a four-way split. Testing the library by identifying known isolates from a separate dataset has shown that a two-way classification performed better (ARCC = 0.66) than a four-way split (ARCC = 0.29). The library can be developed further by adding more representative isolates per host source. Nevertheless, our results have shown that combining profiles from BOX-A1R and (GTG) 5 is recommended in developing the MST library for Laguna Lake.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom