Private emptiers' perspectives on the regulation of faecal sludge emptying services in Sub-Saharan Africa
Author(s) -
Alix Lerebours,
R E Scott,
Kevin Sansom
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of water sanitation and hygiene for development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2408-9362
pISSN - 2043-9083
DOI - 10.2166/washdev.2021.026
Subject(s) - sanctions , context (archaeology) , business , order (exchange) , incentive , competition (biology) , public economics , sanitation , service (business) , economics , marketing , political science , geography , engineering , law , environmental engineering , finance , market economy , ecology , archaeology , biology
Using a two-round Delphi study, 15 faecal sludge emptiers from 11 cities in Sub-Saharan Africa have expressed views on the regulation of faecal sludge emptying services. Their responses identify the regulatory mechanisms in place where they operate, their opinions of these mechanisms, and prioritisation of those considered most useful to enable safe emptying services for all urban residents. All respondents (100%) support regulation, with 80% finding the regulation they encounter useful. However, all also state that regulatory mechanisms should extend beyond only rules and sanctions, to incorporate support, incentives and pro-poor mechanisms. This study is the first to provide a first-hand account of Sub-Saharan African private emptiers' willingness to accept clear regulation. In that regard, regulation should be flexible and adapted to the context in order to facilitate fair competition, safe and satisfactory service for customers and workers alike, and to alleviate the public and environmental health risks.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom