z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Unpacking piped water consumption subsidies: Who benefits? New evidence from 10 countries
Author(s) -
Laura Abramovsky,
Luis Andrés,
George Joseph,
Juan Pablo Rud,
Germán Sember,
Michael Thibert
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of water sanitation and hygiene for development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.414
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 2408-9362
pISSN - 2043-9083
DOI - 10.2166/washdev.2020.073
Subject(s) - subsidy , consumption (sociology) , tariff , population , business , developing country , service (business) , economics , public economics , economic growth , international economics , market economy , marketing , demography , sociology , social science
This paper provides new evidence on the recent performance of piped water consumption subsidies in terms of pro-poor targeting for 10 lowand middle-income countries around the world. Our results suggest that in these countries, existing tariff structures fall well short of recovering the costs of service provision, and that, moreover, the resulting subsidies largely fail to achieve the goal of improving the accessibility and affordability of piped water among the poor. Instead, the majority of subsidies in all 10 countries are captured by the richest households. On average, across the 10 lowand middle-income countries examined, 56% of subsidies end up in the pockets of the richest 20%, but only 6% of subsidies find their way to the poorest 20%. This is predominantly due to the most vulnerable segments of the population facing challenges in access and connection to piped water services. Shortcomings in the design of the subsidy, conditional on poor households being connected, exist but are less important.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom