Physically-based modelling, uncertainty, and pragmatism – Comment on: ‘Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based hydrological modelling’ by Jens Christian Refsgaard, Børge Storm and Thomas Clausen | Zendy

John Ewen | Zendy; Enda O’Connell | Zendy; James C. Bathurst | Zendy; Stephen Birkinshaw | Zendy; Chris Kilsby | Zendy; Geoff Parkin | Zendy; Greg O’Donnell | Zendy

Open Access

Physically-based modelling, uncertainty, and pragmatism – Comment on: ‘Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based hydrological modelling’ by Jens Christian Refsgaard, Børge Storm and Thomas Clausen

Author(s) -

John Ewen,

Enda O’Connell,

James C. Bathurst,

Stephen Birkinshaw,

Chris Kilsby,

Geoff Parkin,

Greg O’Donnell

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

hydrology research

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665

H-Index - 48

eISSN - 1996-9694

pISSN - 0029-1277

DOI - 10.2166/nh.2012.138

Subject(s) - computer science , operations research , development (topology) , management science , engineering , mathematics , mathematical analysis

The Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE) modelling system and physically-based distributed modelling (PBDM) were discussed in Refsgaard et al.'s Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based hydrological modelling (Hydrology Research41, pp. 355–377). The opportunity is taken here to correct some oversights and potentially misleading perspectives in that paper and mount a more robust defence of PBDM.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research