z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prediction of the three-dimensional flow field and bed shear stresses in a regulated river in mid-Norway
Author(s) -
Nils Rüther,
J. P. JACOBSEN,
Nils Reidar B. Olsen,
Geir Vatne
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
hydrology research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1996-9694
pISSN - 0029-1277
DOI - 10.2166/nh.2010.064
Subject(s) - computational fluid dynamics , discretization , unstructured grid , geology , shear stress , flow (mathematics) , grid , finite volume method , current (fluid) , mechanics , fluvial , computation , free surface , upwind scheme , streamflow , hydrology (agriculture) , geotechnical engineering , environmental science , mathematics , geomorphology , algorithm , geodesy , geography , drainage basin , mathematical analysis , physics , oceanography , structural basin , cartography
This study evaluates the use of two Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques in calculating the three-dimensional flow and bed shear stress distribution in a regulated river reach near Trondheim, Norway. The two different CFD codes being used in this study are: one commercial FLOW-3D and an in-house program, SSIIM, developed by the third author (NRBO). One of the primary differences between the programs is that FLOW-3D uses an orthogonal, structured grid, while SSIIM uses a non-orthogonal unstructured grid. Flow-3D computes the location of the free water surface based on a volume of fluid method. In the current study, the water surface profile was computed using a 1D backwater computation with SSIIM. Both programs use first- or second-order schemes for the convective term in the Navier–Stokes equations, and the study investigated both options for the two different models. The computed results were compared to ADCP measurements obtained from three cross sections of the river. The comparison showed a good agreement between calculated and measured velocities when using higher-order discretization schemes. Using a first-order upwind scheme, the results deteriorated somewhat due to false diffusion. The results of this current study could be beneficial for the estimation of fluvial erosion, which causes severe damages to riverine areas.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom