z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Spring Flood Meltwater or Groundwater?
Author(s) -
Allan Rodhe
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
hydrology research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1996-9694
pISSN - 0029-1277
DOI - 10.2166/nh.1981.0002
Subject(s) - meltwater , snowmelt , groundwater , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental science , streams , spring (device) , groundwater discharge , infiltration (hvac) , streamflow , precipitation , aquifer , geology , snow , groundwater flow , drainage basin , geomorphology , geography , mechanical engineering , computer network , geotechnical engineering , cartography , meteorology , computer science , engineering
The environmental isotope oxygen-18 was used as a tracer to separate stream discharge into flows originating from groundwater and fresh meltwater. Two, mainly forested, watersheds (areas 6.6 and 4.0 km2) in southern Sweden were studied during snowmelt 1979. The seasonal variation of δ18O in precipitation makes the δ18O of meltwater different from that of groundwater, hence making the separation possible. The major part of the streamflow this spring originated from groundwater. Of the total water volumes that left the areas, during the two periods of snowmelt that occurred this year, the fraction of groundwater ranged between 0.7 ± 0.2 and 0.9(±) 0.2 The volume of meltwater in the streams corresponded to the volume of snowmelt and precipitation over 10-15% of the catchments. A field survey indicated that these percentages reasonably well describe the extension of the saturated areas, i.e. the effluent areas for groundwater where no infiltration can take place.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom