z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Application of GIS-based models of weights of evidence, weighting factor, and statistical index in spatial modeling of groundwater
Author(s) -
Saeed Khoshtinat,
Babak Aminnejad,
Yousef Hassanzadeh,
Hassan Ahmadi
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of hydroinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1465-1734
pISSN - 1464-7141
DOI - 10.2166/hydro.2019.127
Subject(s) - weighting , groundwater , bivariate analysis , altitude (triangle) , statistics , receiver operating characteristic , topographic wetness index , inverse distance weighting , elevation (ballistics) , geographic information system , hydrology (agriculture) , mathematics , environmental science , geology , remote sensing , digital elevation model , geotechnical engineering , multivariate interpolation , geometry , medicine , radiology , bilinear interpolation
The present research aims at applying three geographic information system (GIS)-based bivariate models, namely, weights of evidence (WOE), weighting factor (WF), and statistical index (SI), for mapping of groundwater potential for sustainable groundwater management. The locations of wells with groundwater yields more than 11 m/h were selected for modeling. Then, these locations were grouped into two categories with 70% (52 locations) in a training dataset to build the model and 30% (22 locations) in a testing dataset to validate it. Conditioning factors, namely, altitude, slope degree, plan curvature, slope aspect, rainfall, soil, land use, geology, distance from fault, and distance from river were selected. Finally, the three achieved maps were compared using area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the ROC curve (AUC). The ROC method result showed that the SI model better fitted the training dataset (AUC1⁄4 0.747) followed by WF (AUC1⁄4 0.742) and WOE (AUC1⁄4 0.737). Results of the testing dataset show that the WOE model (AUC1⁄4 0.798) outperforms SI (AUC1⁄4 0.795) and WF (AUC1⁄4 0.791). According to the WF model, altitude and rainfall had the highest and lowest impacts on groundwater well potential occurrence, respectively. With regard to Friedman test, the difference in performances of these three models was not statistically

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom