z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Experimental studies on scour of supercritical flow jets in upstream of screens and modelling scouring dimensions using artificial intelligence to combine multiple models (AIMM)
Author(s) -
Sina Sadeghfam,
Rasoul Daneshfaraz,
Rahman Khatibi,
Omar Minaei
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of hydroinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1465-1734
pISSN - 1464-7141
DOI - 10.2166/hydro.2019.076
Subject(s) - froude number , supercritical flow , range (aeronautics) , supercritical fluid , mean squared error , support vector machine , residual , engineering , flow (mathematics) , experimental data , empirical modelling , mathematics , geotechnical engineering , simulation , computer science , statistics , artificial intelligence , algorithm , geometry , chemistry , organic chemistry , aerospace engineering
Performances of screens in watercourses are investigated for dissipating energy of supercritical flows, capable of inducing scour or stabilising hydraulic jumps. Subsequent scouring pits are characterised by pit depth and pit length. Inherent processes are studied through laboratory tests by producing a set of empirical data to formulate a model of the scour for explaining subsequent processes. The experimental set-up comprises: (i) Froude number of supercritical flows (range: 3.5–8.0); (ii) particle densimetric Froude number (range: 2–10) using five granular samples; and (iii) two screen porosities (40% and 50%). Trained and tested artificial intelligence models explain the data by expressing depth and length of the pit through the following levels: Level 1: use the experimental data and test the models of: Sugeno fuzzy logic (SFL) and neuro-fuzzy (NF); and Level 2: use outputs of Level 1 models as inputs to support vector machine (SVM). The results reveal that the Level 2 model improves model performances compared with the single models with respect to R, root mean square error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSC) and residual errors. While Level 1 models remain fit-for-purpose, the comparative improvement from Level 1 to Level 2 can be as high as 58% in terms of NSC for the testing phase. doi: 10.2166/hydro.2019.076 s://iwaponline.com/jh/article-pdf/21/5/893/602843/jh0210893.pdf Sina Sadeghfam Rasoul Daneshfaraz (corresponding author) Omar Minaei Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, East Azerbaijan, Iran E-mail: daneshfaraz@maragheh.ac.ir Rahman Khatibi GTEV-ReX Limited, Swindon, UK

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom