z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of three global optimization algorithms for calibration of the Xinanjiang model parameters
Author(s) -
Dongmei Xu,
Wenchuan Wang,
Kwokwing Chau,
Chuntian Cheng,
Shouyu Chen
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of hydroinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1465-1734
pISSN - 1464-7141
DOI - 10.2166/hydro.2012.053
Subject(s) - streamflow , flood forecasting , genetic algorithm , calibration , flood myth , surface runoff , set (abstract data type) , environmental science , computer science , data set , algorithm , mathematical optimization , hydrology (agriculture) , meteorology , drainage basin , statistics , mathematics , engineering , artificial intelligence , machine learning , geography , geotechnical engineering , ecology , cartography , archaeology , biology , programming language
The Xinanjiang model, a conceptual rainfall-runoff (CRR) model with distributed parameters, has been successfully and widely applied to flood forecasting of large basins in humid and semi-humid regions of China. With an increasing demand for timely and accurate forecasts in hydrology, how to obtain more appropriate parameters for CRR models has long been an important topic. These models have a large number of parameters which cannot be directly obtained from measurable quantities of catchments characteristics. In this study, three different optimization methods are used to calibrate the Xinanjiang streamflow model: genetic algorithm (GA), shuffled complex evolution of the University of Arizona (SCE-UA) and the recently developed shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm of the University of Arizona (SCEM-UA), using streamflow data of the Shuangpai Reservoir in China. Two different time steps of 1 and 3 hr are used in the analysis. The results indicate that the SCEM-UA algorithm can infer the most probable parameter set and furnish useful information about the nature of the response surface in the vicinity of the optimum. Moreover, there is larger uncertainty for 1 hr forecasting than for 3 hr forecasting. This is significant in assessing risks in likely applications of Xinanjiang models.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineerin

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom