Neural network rainfall-runoff forecasting based on continuous resampling
Author(s) -
Robert J. Abrahart
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of hydroinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1465-1734
pISSN - 1464-7141
DOI - 10.2166/hydro.2003.0004
Subject(s) - overfitting , resampling , safeguard , artificial neural network , computer science , representation (politics) , surface runoff , sample (material) , process (computing) , set (abstract data type) , partition (number theory) , data mining , machine learning , artificial intelligence , mathematics , ecology , chemistry , chromatography , combinatorics , politics , political science , law , biology , programming language , operating system
Most neural network hydrological modelling has used split-sample validation to ensure good out-of-sample generalisation and thus safeguard each potential solution against the danger of overfitting. However, given that each sub-set is required to provide a comprehensive and sufficient representation of both environmental inputs and hydrological processes, then to partition the data could create limited individual representations that are, in some manner or other, deficient with respect to fitness-for-purpose. To address this issue a comparison has been undertaken between neural network rainfall-runoff models developed using (a) conventional stopping conditions and (b) a continuous single-model bootstrap. The results exhibit marginal improvement in terms of greater accuracies and better global generalisations—but the operation itself demonstrates substantial benefits through the provision of additional diagnostic capabilities and increased automation with respect to certain problematic aspects of the model development process.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom