z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Real time control schemes for improving water quality from bioretention cells
Author(s) -
P. P. Persaud,
Aaron A. Akin,
Branko Kerkez,
David McCarthy,
Jon M. Hathaway
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
blue-green systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2617-4782
DOI - 10.2166/bgs.2019.924
Subject(s) - bioretention , stormwater , impervious surface , environmental science , surface runoff , water quality , environmental engineering , total suspended solids , pollutant , hydrology (agriculture) , engineering , wastewater , chemistry , ecology , chemical oxygen demand , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry , biology
Extreme weather and the proliferation of impervious areas in urban watersheds increases the frequency of flood events and deepens water quality concerns. Bioretention is a type of green infrastructure practice developed to mitigate these impacts by reducing peak flows, runoff volume, and nutrient loads in stormwater. However, studies have shown inconsistency in the ability of bioretention to manage some pollutants, particularly some forms of nitrogen. Innovative sensor and control technologies are being tested to actively manage urban stormwater, primarily in open water stormwater systems such as wet ponds. Through these cyber-physical controls, it may be possible to optimize storage time and/or soil moisture dynamics within bioretention cells to create more favorable conditions for water quality improvements. A column study testing the influence of active control on bioretention system performance was conducted over a nine-week period. Active control columns were regulated based on either maintaining a specific water level or soil moisture content and were compared to free draining (FD) and internal water storage standards. Actively controlled bioretention columns performed similarly, with the soil moisture-based control showing the best performance with over 86% removal of metals and TSS while also exhibiting the highest ammonium removal (43%) and second highest nitrate removal (74%). While all column types showed mostly similar TSS and metal removal trends (median 94 and 98%, respectively), traditionally FD and internal water storage configurations promoted aerobic and anaerobic processes, respectively, which suggests that actively controlled systems have greater potential for targeting both processes. The results suggest that active controls can improve upon standard bioretention designs, but further optimization is required to balance the water quality benefits gained by retention time against storage needs for impending storms.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom