z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Writing and Learning in View of the Lab: Why "They" Might be Right
Author(s) -
Catherine Prendergast
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
literacy in composition studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2326-5620
DOI - 10.21623/1.1.2.2
Subject(s) - emic and etic , mathematics education , scientific writing , pedagogy , psychology , qualitative research , professional writing , field (mathematics) , sociology , linguistics , social science , philosophy , mathematics , anthropology , pure mathematics
To interrogate the field’s current understanding of writing as central to learning in the sciences, this study offers results from a qualitative, emic study of college students and their scientist mentors at work in an NSF-sponsored Research Experience for Undergraduates. I observed that the work of this professional research laboratory mainly recruited and developed literacies, such as manual dexterity and visual acuity, other than language-based ones. Describing here the various laboratory activities that fostered higher-order thinking and knowledge transformation, I conclude that “writing to learn” research must consider how writing fits in with an ever-developing understanding of the complexity of learning.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom