Comparison between Numerical, Analytical, and Field Solutions with Experimental Data for 90º Open Channel Junctions
Author(s) -
Ahmed H. Zahran,
Tamer A. Gado,
Ebrahim Rashwan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of engineering research - egypt/journal of engineering research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2735-4873
pISSN - 2356-9441
DOI - 10.21608/erjeng.2019.125701
Subject(s) - froude number , turbulence , mechanics , channel (broadcasting) , open channel flow , flow (mathematics) , experimental data , field (mathematics) , reynolds averaged navier–stokes equations , fluent , geometry , section (typography) , computer simulation , mathematics , physics , engineering , computer science , statistics , electrical engineering , pure mathematics , operating system
Junction in open channel flow points out any side water secession from natural or artificial channels. In the last decades, comprehensive theoretical and experimental investigations on the dividing flow in open channel junctions have been executed to understand the characteristics of this separating flow. In this research, a three-dimensional turbulence model by fluent software used to replicate the flow characteristics of a 90o open channel junctions for two geometries. One is with equal width and horizontal bed and the other is field canal junction with irregular section. The modeling is based on the Navier-Stokes equation and κ-ω turbulent model. Comparing prepared to the numerical solution, the analytical model and the field works with published experimental data. The comparison showed that the numerical solution gave good agreements with maximum discrepancy 1.620% for rectangular sections and 0.718% for irregular sections than the published experimental data. The analytical solution gave a large error than numerical with a maximum discrepancy of 2.95% for the rectangular section and 11.485% for irregular sections than the published experimental data. A proposed relation between discharge ratio with upstream Froude number and depth ratio for the irregular section is suggested. The proposed equation has a maximum discrepancy equal to 0.433% with reference to the field data recorded.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom