Effect of Different Preparation Designs on the Fracture Load of Two Machinable Laminate Veneers
Author(s) -
Sara Tamimi,
Eman Essam,
Jylan El Guindy
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
al-azhar dental journal for girls
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2537-0316
pISSN - 2537-0308
DOI - 10.21608/adjg.2017.5197
Subject(s) - materials science , butt joint , cubic zirconia , veneer , crown (dentistry) , fracture (geology) , composite material , universal testing machine , ceramic , flexural strength , joint (building) , dental porcelain , ultimate tensile strength , structural engineering , engineering , metallurgy
Aim: The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of different preparation designs [window, butt- Joint, and incisal overlap], on the fracture load of two CAD / CAM laminate veneer materials [Zirconia CAD / CAM and resinnanoceramic ; lava ultimate].Materials and Methods: Thirty maxillary anterior teeth were restored with ceramic laminate veneers and divided into 6 groups as follows: group I-A (laminates made of Ultra translucent zirconia CAD with window preparation design), group I-B (laminates made of Ultra translucent zirconia CAD with butt-joint preparation design), group I-C (laminates made of Ultra translucent zirconia CAD with incisal overlap preparation design), group II-A (laminates made of Lava ultimate (Resin nano ceramic) CAD with window preparation design), group II-B (laminates made of Lava ultimate CAD with butt-joint preparation design), group II-C (laminates made of Lava ultimate CAD with incisal overlap preparation design). Fracture load test was performed using the Universal Testing Machine (UTM). Data were statistically analyzed using One-way analysis of variance ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisontest. The results of the fracture load test were recorded in Newton: (I-A: 288.08N);(I-B: 322.47N); (I-C: 365.38N); (II-A: 301.15N); (II-B: 324.94N); (II-C: 394.95N). The results of the current study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the means of fracture load for window, butt-joint and incisal overlap preparation designs among zirconia material. While, there was statistically highly significant difference between the means of fracture load for window, butt-joint and incisal overlap preparation designs among Lava ultimate material. The mean of fracture load for incisal over-lap preparation design was the highest, followed by butt-joint and window designs. Nonetheless, there were no statistically significant differences between translucent zirconia and lava ultimate regarding the fracture loadamong window, butt-joint and incisal overlap preparation designs.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom