z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR
Author(s) -
Robert Hopkins
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
vascular health and risk management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.892
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1178-2048
pISSN - 1176-6344
DOI - 10.2147/vhrm.s3810
Subject(s) - medicine , perioperative , randomized controlled trial , observational study , cinahl , medline , meta analysis , randomization , surgery , psychological intervention , psychiatry , political science , law
To investigate if study design factors such as randomization, multi-center versus single center evidence, institutional surgical volume, and patient selection affect the outcomes for endovascular repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR). Finally, we investigate trends over time in EVAR versus OSR outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom