A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature | Zendy

Lehana Thabane | Zendy; Samaan | Zendy; Lawrence Mbuagbaw | Zendy; Sarah Daisy Kosa | Zendy; Borg Debono | Zendy; Dillenburg | Zendy; Zhang | Zendy; Vincent Fruci | Zendy; Brittany B. Dennis | Zendy; Monica Bawor | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature

Author(s) -

Lehana Thabane,

Samaan,

Lawrence Mbuagbaw,

Sarah Daisy Kosa,

Borg Debono,

Dillenburg,

Zhang,

Vincent Fruci,

Brittany B. Dennis,

Monica Bawor

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

journal of multidisciplinary healthcare

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65

H-Index - 30

ISSN - 1178-2390

DOI - 10.2147/jmdh.s43952

Subject(s) - observational study , strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology , systematic review , medicine , consolidated standards of reporting trials , medline , data extraction , protocol (science) , family medicine , alternative medicine , health care , meta analysis , pathology , economic growth , political science , law , economics

Reporting guidelines have been available for the past 17 years since the inception of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement in 1996. These guidelines were developed to improve the quality of reporting of studies in medical literature. Despite the widespread availability of these guidelines, the quality of reporting of medical literature remained suboptimal. In this study, we assess the current adherence practice to reporting guidelines; determine key factors associated with better adherence to these guidelines; and provide recommendations to enhance adherence to reporting guidelines for future studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research