A systematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health | Zendy

Lucylynn Lizarondo | Zendy; Karen Grimmer | Zendy; Saravana Kumar | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A systematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health

Author(s) -

Lucylynn Lizarondo,

Karen Grimmer,

Saravana Kumar

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

journal of multidisciplinary healthcare

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65

H-Index - 30

ISSN - 1178-2390

DOI - 10.2147/jmdh.s23144

Subject(s) - evidence based practice , quality (philosophy) , medical education , psychology , medicine , systematic review , evidence based medicine , perception , alternative medicine , medline , applied psychology , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , political science , law , neuroscience

The use of evidence-based practice (EBP) is often not reflected in allied health (AH) practitioners' day-to-day practice (the research-practice gap). Research suggests that considerable differences between and within AH disciplines exist, which require different approaches in order to influence practice behavior. It is therefore important to develop a better understanding of what influences individual AH practitioners' adoption of evidence into daily practice.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research