Reliability of a seminar grading rubric in a grand rounds course | Zendy

Eric J. MacLaughlin | Zendy; Fike | Zendy; Clara V. Álvarez | Zendy; Seifert | Zendy; Blaszczyk | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Reliability of a seminar grading rubric in a grand rounds course

Author(s) -

Eric J. MacLaughlin,

Fike,

Clara V. Álvarez,

Seifert,

Blaszczyk

Publication year - 2010

Publication title -

journal of multidisciplinary healthcare

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65

H-Index - 30

ISSN - 1178-2390

DOI - 10.2147/jmdh.s12346

Subject(s) - rubric , grading (engineering) , cronbach's alpha , inter rater reliability , internal consistency , medicine , medical education , reliability (semiconductor) , significant difference , presentation (obstetrics) , content validity , psychology , mathematics education , clinical psychology , psychometrics , surgery , rating scale , developmental psychology , power (physics) , civil engineering , physics , quantum mechanics , engineering

Formal presentations are a common requirement for students in health professional programs, and evaluations are often viewed as subjective. To date, literature describing the reliability or validity of seminar grading rubrics is lacking. The objectives of this study were to characterize inter-rater agreement and internal consistency of a grading rubric used in a grand rounds seminar course.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research