English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The authors studied seven wine rating scales judged to be useful for the wine producer, consumer, or oenologic researcher: (1) My Wine Rating scale; (2) the Amerine and Roessler (1983) wine rating system; (3) the redwinebuzz.com rating system; (4) Robert Parker’s wine rating scale; (5) the Wine Spectator scale; (6) the Stephen Tanzer scale; and (7) the Chebnikowski Winespider evaluation system. Statistics were applied to answer three hypothetical oenologic questions: (1) Does a particular wine meet criterion for everyday consumption? (2) How well do tasters agree on both the level of wine aroma and bouquet? And (3) How well do tasters agree on the overall quality of a wine, both currently, and after it has been appropriately cellared for 10 years? The implications of this study were discussed in terms of their heuristic value for further oenologic research. One fundamental issue that has received little or no attention in oenologic research is a determination of measurable taster variability that can be expected to occur when the same wine is blind tasted again, either by the same taster or by other tasters blindly evaluating the same wine.

Wine rating scales: Assessing their utility for producers, consumers, and oenologic researchers