Comparison of Target Enrichment Strategies for Ancient Pathogen DNA
Author(s) -
Anja Furtwängler,
Judith Neukamm,
Lisa Böhme,
Ella Reiter,
Melanie Vollstedt,
Natasha Arora,
Pushpendra Singh,
Stewart T. Cole,
Sascha Knauf,
Sébastien CalvignacSpencer,
Ben KrauseKyora,
Johannes Krause,
Verena J. Schuenemann,
Alexander Herbig
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
biotechniques
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1940-9818
pISSN - 0736-6205
DOI - 10.2144/btn-2020-0100
Subject(s) - pathogen , biology , dna , ancient dna , genetics , computational biology , evolutionary biology , medicine , population , environmental health
In ancient DNA research, the degraded nature of the samples generally results in poor yields of highly fragmented DNA; targeted DNA enrichment is thus required to maximize research outcomes. The three commonly used methods – array-based hybridization capture and in-solution capture using either RNA or DNA baits – have different characteristics that may influence the capture efficiency, specificity and reproducibility. Here we compare their performance in enriching pathogen DNA of Mycobacterium leprae and Treponema pallidum from 11 ancient and 19 modern samples. We find that in-solution approaches are the most effective method in ancient and modern samples of both pathogens and that RNA baits usually perform better than DNA baits.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom