Optimizing leading edge F-actin labeling using multiple actin probes, fixation methods and imaging modalities
Author(s) -
Vera DesMarais,
Robert J. Eddy,
Ved P. Sharma,
Orrin J. Stone,
John S. Condeelis
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
biotechniques
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1940-9818
pISSN - 0736-6205
DOI - 10.2144/btn-2018-0112
Subject(s) - lamellipodium , actin , phalloidin , cytoskeleton , actin cytoskeleton , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , protein filament , biophysics , chemistry , cell , biochemistry
We systematically evaluated the performance and reliability of several widely used, commercially available actin-filament probes in a highly motile breast adenocarcinoma cell line to optimize the visualization of F-actin-rich dynamic lamellipodia. We evaluated four Phalloidin-fluorophores, two anti-actin antibodies, and three live-cell actin probes in five fixation conditions across three imaging platforms as a basis for the design of optimized protocols. Of the fluorescent phalloidin-dye conjugates tested, Alexa Fluor-488 Phalloidin ranked best in overall labeling of the actin cytoskeleton and maintenance of the fluorescence signal over time. Use of actin monoclonal antibodies revealed significant limitations under a variety of fixation-permeabilization conditions. Evaluation of commonly used live-cell probes provides evidence for actin filament bias, with TagRFP-Lifeact excluded from lamellipodia, but not mEGFP-Lifeact or F-tractin-EGFP.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom