Screening for Ribosomal-Based False Positives Following Prokaryotic mRNA Differential Display
Author(s) -
Aaron C. Nagel,
James T. Fleming,
Gary S. Sayler,
Kenneth L. Beattie
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
biotechniques
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1940-9818
pISSN - 0736-6205
DOI - 10.2144/01305st04
Subject(s) - false positive paradox , biology , pseudomonas putida , ribosomal rna , messenger rna , gene , computational biology , rna , 23s ribosomal rna , microbiology and biotechnology , pseudomonas aeruginosa , genetics , bacteria , ribosome , computer science , machine learning
Differential display (DD) and the closely related RNA arbitrarily primed PCR (RAP-PCR) have become the molecular tools of choice for identifying and isolating differentially expressed genes in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems. However, one of the current drawbacks of both techniques is the high number of false positives generated. In prokaryotic applications, the many false positives typically generated by DD are subsequently identified as rRNAs because of their greater abundance compared to mRNAs. To circumvent this problem, full-length 16S and 23S rDNA probes, derived from Pseudomonas putida G7 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa FRD1, respectively, were used as a prescreening approach to discriminate between those bands, which appear to be differentially expressed mRNAs, but in fact are rRNAs, following prokaryotic mRNA DD.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom