Electrophoresis of Unlabeled Proteins in a Sequencing Gel Apparatus
Author(s) -
Claudio Luparello
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
biotechniques
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1940-9818
pISSN - 0736-6205
DOI - 10.2144/00281bm05
Subject(s) - gel electrophoresis , computational biology , biology , the internet , microbiology and biotechnology , computer science , world wide web
In an earlier issue of this journal, Whelan and Taylor (4) described the adaptation of the Sequi-Gen electrophoretic cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) for analysis of proteins. Their paper demonstrated that, with slight modifications of the plate assembly and gel loading protocols, it was possible to obtain a large degree of separation of the radiolabeled polypeptides electrophoresed, as checked after gel drying onto chromatography paper and autoradiography. In the same paper, the authors stated that a full-length run of unlabeled proteins was not recommended for the handling of long floating gels during Coomassie Blue or silver staining and suggested electrophoresis of the samples for half of the length of the gel, followed by cutting the latter for stain processing. Here, we produce evidence that unlabeled protein mixtures, such as cell protein extracts, can be successfully submitted to full-length electrophoresis in sequencing gels without significant modifications of the preparation technique as described by the manufacturers. MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells were maintained in culture in RPMI 1640 medium plus 10% fetal calf serum for 5 days and total proteins were obtained as reported by Wang et al. (3). Essentially, subconfluent cells were washed 3× with prewarmed PBS, lysed in a flask with 20 mmol/L TrisHCl, pH 7.4, containing 2% SDS and the mixture of protease inhibitors recommended. The extract was precipitated with 100% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), washed with 2.5% TCA, neutralized with 3 mol/L Tris-base and stored at -20°C in 1.5 mol/L Tris-base until used. The protein concentration was evaluated by the Lowry method. To prepare the electrophoretic apparatus, the reservoir-bearing plate of a Sequi-Gen cell (21 × 40 cm) was treated with 500 μL of Silanization Solution I (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) or SigmaCote (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to avoid gel attachment. The glass plate was treated with a freshly prepared binding solution (5 μL γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane from Sigma and 5 μL glacial acetic acid in 1 mL 95% ethanol) to cross-link the gel. The glassplate sandwich was then assembled with the standard 0.4 mm thick spacers. A hundred milliliters of SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis solution were prepared according to standard protocols (1) and degassed. Five milliliters of this solution were mixed with 50 μL of 10% ammonium persulfate and 5 μL of TEMED and used for gel bottom sealing according to the manufacturers’ instructions; after successful polymerization of the seal, the separating gel was poured slowly with a 50 mL syringe, and the comb was inserted before the gel polymerized. We have successfully prepared both monophasic slabs consisting of a uniform separating gel and biphasic slabs containing a stacking gel with no remarkable difference in protein band resolution. However, in the latter case, the gel comb should be inserted more deeply between the plates to allow space (~ 0.5 cm) for the polymerization of a stacking gel mixture, prepared according to the standard protocol (1). Thus, after setting of the separating gel and comb removal, the gel surface was washed with distilled water that was blotted onto a piece of filter paper, the stacking gel solution poured and the comb inserted again before the polymerization of the upper gel. Following this protocol, one complete gel was produced in approximately 2 h. After assembling the apparatus, pouring the running buffer and flushing the wells with a 5 mL syringe, the protein samples were mixed at a 1:1 ratio with a 2× concentrated dithiothreitolcontaining sample buffer, boiled for 3 min, and up to 6 μL of the mixture was loaded into each well and electrophoresed for 14 h at 300 V. At the end of the run, the electrophoretic cell was disassembled, and the gel, attached to the glass plate, was easily handled for staining into containers of the appropriate size, such as the 48 × 27 cm polypropylene trays from Aldrich Chemical (Milwaukee, WI, USA). The gel was silver-stained according to the protocol published by Swain and Ross (2). The water used for all the solutions and washings was Milli-Q (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) grade. Accordingly, the gel was fixed with 40% ethanol/ 10% acetic acid for 10 min, rinsed with water for 10 min and fixed/sensitized with 0.05% glutaraldehyde/0.01% formalin/40% ethanol for 5 min. After sequential rinsing with 40% ethanol and water for 20 min each, the gel was sensitized with 0.2 g sodium thiosulphate/L for 1 min, rinsed with water for 2 × 1 min and treated with 0.1% silver nitrate for 20 min. After rinsing with water for 1 min, the stain was developed with 2.5% sodium carbonate/0.04% formalin; it is suggested to incubate the gel with an aliquot of the developing solution until the latter turns yellow and then substituting with a fresh one to avoid silver deposition onto the gel surface and to improve the quality of the stain. When the desired stain intensity was Benchmarks
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom