New insights on single-stranded versus double-stranded DNA library preparation for ancient DNA
Author(s) -
Nathan Wales,
Christian Car⊘e,
Marcela SandovalVelasco,
Cristina Gamba,
Ross Barnett,
José Alfredo Samaniego Castruita,
Jazmín RamosMadrigal,
Ludovic Orlando,
M. Thomas P. Gilbert
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
biotechniques
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1940-9818
pISSN - 0736-6205
DOI - 10.2144/000114364
Subject(s) - dna , endogeny , double stranded , ancient dna , biology , library , genomic library , microbiology and biotechnology , dna synthesis , computational biology , genetics , biochemistry , gene , base sequence , population , 16s ribosomal rna , demography , sociology
An innovative single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) library preparation method has sparked great interest among ancient DNA (aDNA) researchers, especially after reports of endogenous DNA content increases >20-fold in some samples. To investigate the behavior of this method, we generated ssDNA and conventional double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) libraries from 23 ancient and historic plant and animal specimens. We found ssDNA library preparation substantially increased endogenous content when dsDNA libraries contained <3% endogenous DNA, but this enrichment is less pronounced when dsDNA preparations successfully recover short endogenous DNA fragments (mean size < 70 bp). Our findings can help researchers determine when to utilize the time- and resource-intensive ssDNA library preparation method.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom