Conflicting Results in SNP Genotype Assessment
Author(s) -
Lise Lotte Hansen,
Bo Eskerod Madsen,
Kristina Pedersen,
Carsten Wiuf
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
biotechniques
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1940-9818
pISSN - 0736-6205
DOI - 10.2144/000112675
Subject(s) - genetics , snp , single nucleotide polymorphism , biology , genotype , tag snp , dna sequencing , population , primer (cosmetics) , linkage (software) , genome , snp genotyping , computational biology , gene , medicine , chemistry , environmental health , organic chemistry
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are highly abundant in the genome and especially useful in the search for disease susceptibility genes via population-based association or linkage studies. Therefore, there is a strong need for high throughput and reliable methodologies to assess the SNP genotypes. Despite an unambiguous result of an SNP analysis, with the use of a commercial kit based on primer extension, subsequent sequencing analysis revealed that a proportion of the genotypes was not correctly assessed. The problem we have encountered may originate from specific structures in the genomic DNA sequence, rather than being a methodological problem.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom