The Policy Implications of Third-Party Funding in Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Author(s) -
Brooke Guven,
Lise Johnson
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ssrn electronic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1556-5068
DOI - 10.2139/ssrn.3661129
Subject(s) - investor state dispute settlement , settlement (finance) , state (computer science) , business , third party , alternative dispute resolution , dispute resolution , law and economics , political science , public administration , finance , economics , law , foreign direct investment , international investment , algorithm , computer science , payment , internet privacy
In this Working Paper, The Policy Implications of Third-Party Funding in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, CCSI analyzes underexplored yet critical policy issues surrounding the use of third-party funding in ISDS. It considers the costs and benefits of the practice, asks whether it is desirable or undesirable that third-parties be permitted to invest in ISDS claims, and if so, under what circumstances and in order to achieve what objectives, and overviews policy responses, including a total or partial ban and various regulatory responses, that may be appropriate to manage identified impacts.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom