z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Redesigning Ratings: Assessing the Discriminatory Power of Credit Scores under Censoring
Author(s) -
Holger Kraft,
Gerald Kroisandt,
Marlene Müller
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
ssrn electronic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1556-5068
DOI - 10.2139/ssrn.302137
Subject(s) - censoring (clinical trials) , actuarial science , statistics , econometrics , medicine , economics , psychology , business , mathematics
In the light of Basel II, redesigning rating systems has been becom- ing an important issue for banks and other financial institutions. The available data base for this task typically contains only the accepted credit applicants and is thus censored. To evaluate existing and alternative rating systems, we would actually need the full data base of all past credit applicants. In this paper we discuss how to assess the performance of credit ratings under the assumption that for credit data only a part of the defaults and non-defaults is observed. The paper investigates criteria that are based on the dierence of the score distribu- tions under default and non-default such as the accuracy ratio. We show how to estimate bounds for these criteria in the usual situation that the bank storages only data of the accepted credit applicants.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom