Lower Bounds on Approximation Errors: Testing the Hypothesis That a Numerical Solution Is Accurate
Author(s) -
Kenneth L. Judd,
Lilia Maliar,
Serguei Maliar
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
ssrn electronic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1556-5068
DOI - 10.2139/ssrn.2484285
Subject(s) - mathematics
We propose a novel methodology for evaluating the accuracy of numerical solutions to dynamic economic models. Speci…cally, we construct a lower bound on the size of approximation errors. A small lower bound on errors is a necessary condition for accuracy: If a lower error bound is unacceptably large, then the actual approximation errors are even larger, and hence, we reject the hypothesis that a numerical solution is accurate. Our accuracy analysis is logically equivalent to hypothesis testing in statistics. As an illustration of our methodology, we assess approximation errors in the …rstand second-order perturbation solutions for two stylized models: a neoclassical growth model and a new Keynesian model. The errors are small for the former model but unacceptably large for the latter model under some empirically relevant parameterizations.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom