z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Check Fraud and the Common Law at the Intersection of Negligence and the Uniform Commercial Code
Author(s) -
Melissa L. Waite
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
ssrn electronic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1556-5068
DOI - 10.2139/ssrn.2296706
Subject(s) - uniform commercial code , law , intersection (aeronautics) , code (set theory) , business , computer security , computer science , political science , engineering , programming language , transport engineering , set (abstract data type)
Technology has changed the payments landscape over the last several decades, both for paper-based check payments and electronic funds transfers. A strict reading of the Code probably requires that common law negligence claims in check fraud scenarios be preempted by the Code, making the comprehensive rights and remedies test the most accurate reflection of the Code’s purposes and policies and it should be adopted by all courts. At the same time, other tests and inconsistent results in applying them suggest that the loss allocation rules are perceived as one-sided and the drafters should consider whether there are more equitable ways to allocate check fraud losses during the next revision cycle. But the allocation provisions provide important protections for banks that make maintenance of the check payment systems possible. In the meantime, banking customers should consider moving to electronic payments because they are safer and the rules governing loss allocation are more equitable than those in check fraud loss allocation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom