z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is Percutaneous Aspiration Better Than Catheter Drainage In Liver Abscess? A Randomized Control Trial
Author(s) -
Ab Hamid Wani,
Satish Parihar,
Nasib Chand Dingra,
Anish Gupta
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
annals of international medical and dental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2395-2822
pISSN - 2395-2814
DOI - 10.21276/aimdr.2017.3.5.sg9
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous , randomized controlled trial , liver abscess , catheter , drainage , surgery , abscess , radiology , general surgery , ecology , biology
Background: To compare the efficacy of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) and percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) in the management of liver abscess > 6 cm in diameter. Methods: Fifty patients were included in this comparative study. Computer generated randomization was done by double blind trial and the patients were divided into two groups, 25 patients in each PCD and PNA group respectively. Comparison of effectiveness was done between the two groups in terms of duration of hospital stay, time to achieve clinical improvement, duration of intravenous antibiotics needed, reduction in the size of abscess cavity and total /near total resolution of abscess cavity. Results: Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) was found to be superior then percutaneous needle aspiration in terms of duration of hospital stay, clinical recovery, reduction in abscess cavity size/ volume and duration for intravenous antibiotics. Conclusion: Percutaneous catheter drainage is better option as compared to percutaneous needle aspiration especially for large abscesses which are partially liquefied or with thick pus.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom