z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
516 Predicting Fruit Set and Evaluating the Effects of Chemical Thinners on Apples
Author(s) -
Duane W. Greene
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
hortscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.518
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 2327-9834
pISSN - 0018-5345
DOI - 10.21273/hortsci.34.3.534e
Subject(s) - thinning , fruit set , pollination , horticulture , netting , petal , biology , botany , mathematics , pollen , political science , law , ecology
The lack of pollination and the effects of blossom thinners were simulated by enclosing selected `McIntosh' apple spurs in super-light insect barrier netting at the pink stage of flower development. Fruit set was recorded and fruit size measured at 2- to 3-day intervals from petal fall until initial set. The effects of lack of pollination or the use of blossom thinners on initial set could not be determined with any degree of accuracy until at least 8 days after petal fall. NAA was applied at 8 ppm when fruit were 8.5 mm in diameter. Fruit set and fruit size were taken at 2- to 3-day intervals until the end of June drop. Fruit set on NAA-treated trees was greater than that on check trees for 2 weeks following application. Although NAA ultimately did cause significant thinning, it was not until 3 to 3.5 weeks after application that it was possible to determine with accuracy the thinning response to NAA. However, the thinning response to NAA could be predicted within a week after application, since growth of fruitlets that ultimately abscised slowed 4 to 7 days after the application of NAA. A working model to predict effective pollination and the response to chemical thinners in apples will be discussed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here