English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Publication Rights Reserved This paper was to be presented at the California Regional Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, to be held in Bakersfield, Calif., Nov. 4–5, 1965, and is considered to an abstract of not more than 300 words, with no illustrations, unless the paper is specifically released to the press by the Editor of the Journal of Petroleum Technology or the Executive Secretary. Such abstract elsewhere after publication in the Journal of Petroleum Technology or Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal is granted on request, providing proper credit is given that publication and the original presentation of the paper. Discussion of this paper is invited. Three copies of any discussion should be sent to the Society of Petroleum Engineers office. Such discussion may be presented at the above meeting and, with the paper, may be considered for publication in one of the two SPE magazines. With the advent of the modern electronic computer, relative permeabilities of reservoir rock to oil and water are used much more than previously in calculating the performances of water floods. Also, appreciably more fluid mechanics are employed in computer problems than before. As a result, small differences in permeability curves often show marked differences in waterflood predictions than some of the earlier procedures would detect. Hence, better advantage can be taken, than previously, of accurate relative permeability curves. This paper points out areas where hidden, yet relatively large, inaccuracies can exist in the use of certain permeability curves that previously were not easily discernible. This paper shows the following.There are many possible combinations of relative permeability curves that will result in virtually the same recovery vs injection, but require different times and rates to recover the oil. This can occur even with different mobility ratios.There are permeability curves obtained by the use of nonviscous oil [less than 2 or 3 cp], when employed for calculating the performances of water floods of viscous oils, which can lead to serious inaccuracies.As far as viscous oils are concerned, the sections of the permeability curves from the breakthrough saturation region to the nearly watered-out end [high water saturation] affect recovery nearly as much as do the terminal values of the permeability curves. Stated in another way, the wettability characteristics in the middle portion of the permeability curve affect recovery nearly as much as other portions of the permeability curve. This is not true for nonviscous oils in water-wet reservoir rock. The difference in magnitude may be of the order of 20 per cent of the recoverable oil. Each of the foregoing is illustrated by one or more examples. Introduction Waterflood calculations using the effective permeability to oil at the interstitial water saturation and the effective permeability to water at the irreducible oil saturation are used in prediction methods. Welge has presented a method that uses relative permeability curves and presents an example using two phases - gas and oil.

Unique Properties Of Permeability Curves Of Concern To Reservoir Engineers