English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There are few certainties in the conduct of epidemiologic research. One thing that can be counted upon, however, is that chance will play some role in the pattern of results observed in any particular study. The basic statistical tools for assessing results with appropriate consideration of the role of chance have been available for some time, but recent commentary in the Journal clearly indicates that we do not yet have a consensus regarding how these tools should be used.`5 In this communication, I offer yet another perspective on what are clearly central issues for the conduct of epidemiologic inquiry.

Statistical criteria in the interpretation of epidemiologic data.